Brand New Tube
srmgin
srmgin 05 Aug 2021
1,670
watermark logo

Up next

What's "The Plan"? You Are! You Always Were
19 Sep 2021
What's "The Plan"? You Are! You Always Were
Evidence Violates Community Guidelines · 132 Views

'GO TO HELL!' - Diane Abbott's BIZARRE and Humiliating Appearance at a BLM Rally!(108

883 Views

Bizarre state of affairs

Show more
25 Comments sort Sort By


alladin123
alladin123 1 month ago

She was a stunner in her younger days ,,just never really very bright .what's with all these white sjws telling black people that their lives matter..? surely they don't need some sychphantic toss pot on his knees to tell them that ?

   0    0
GodofThunder
GodofThunder 1 month ago

Jews were the biggest slave traders.

   0    0
tamsyn
tamsyn 1 month ago

Alex Thompson UK Column was being interviewed by James Delingpole and alluded to JRM and family having very dark dealings but didn't go into detail. Never liked the 18th century fop anyway. What was this video supposed to be about? Mostly white BLM people (absurd) and Diane Abbott just standing there? Think what you like abouut Abbott but she was the only one standing up for Assange in Parliament when he was hauled out of that embassy and into Belmarsh, where he still resides. Shameful. Fuck you Trump. Milksop.

   0    0
MahaAl
MahaAl 2 months ago

the police should be defunded

   0    0
2 months ago

⁣A child born to a female redemptioner could become the property of her owner and the mother’s term extended. For example, George Cummins had the indenture of his white servant woman named Christian Finney extended by a year and her child bound for thirty-one years by order of the Carteret County Count on December 7, 1736. When she applied to the court for her freedom on June 9, 1744, the court ruled that she serve another five months to pay for the cost incurred by her owner to bring the earlier action. When she applied again 6 months later, she was ordered to serve an additional year for having a “Mulatto Child in the time of her servitude.”
Blacks and Indians came to own, and abuse, whites in Virginia in such large numbers that in 1670 the House of Burgesses (legislature) proclaimed that ” . . . noe negro or Indian though baptyised and enjoyned their own ffreedome shall be capable of any purchase of christians, but yet not debarred from buying any of their own nation.” [Original spelling.] “Christian” was a euphemism of the period for Caucasian. Virginia’s Slave Code of 1705 provided: “That no negroes, mulattos, Indians, although christians, ore Jew, Moore, Mahometans, or other infidels, shall at any time, purchase any Christian, nor any other, except of their own complexion, or such as are declared slaves by this act.” “[73]
http://www.ironbarkresources.c....om/slaves/whiteslave

   0    0
Show more

Up next

What's "The Plan"? You Are! You Always Were
19 Sep 2021
What's "The Plan"? You Are! You Always Were
Evidence Violates Community Guidelines · 132 Views