Brand New Tube
hugotalks
hugotalks 17 Jan 2021
3,173
watermark logo

Up next

FINLAND - WOMAN FORCIBLY DETAINED AND TAKEN FROM HER HOME FOR SUSPICION OF HAVING COVID!
07 Mar 2021
FINLAND - WOMAN FORCIBLY DETAINED AND TAKEN FROM HER HOME FOR SUSPICION OF HAVING COVID!
DivideUsWeFall 7 Views

120,000 Care Home Staff Refuse JAB / Hugo Talks #lockdown

845 Views

120,000 Care Home Staff Refuse JAB / Hugo Talks #lockdown
* Subscribe to NEW WEBSITE 馃憠 https://hugotalks.com/ *
Follow me on Odysee @ https://odysee.com/@hugotalks:8
Follow me on bitchute @ https://www.bitchute.com/channel/hugotalks
Follow me on MINDS @ https://www.minds.com/hugotalks/
Follow me on brandnewtube @ https://brandnewtube.com/@hugotalks
Follow me on twitter @ https://twitter.com/hugotalks1

Show more
24 Comments sort Sort By


DoubleDutch1971
DoubleDutch1971 2 months ago

Those 120000 will be in high demand as the muzzled zombies who WILL accept the vaccine will get sick and likely die soon after.

   1    0
Augustus20
Augustus20 2 months ago

Hello, You might be interested to read this: Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna鈥檚 鈥95% effective鈥 vaccines鈥攍et鈥檚 be cautious and first see the full data - The BMJ The first is a BMJ article from 26 November written by Peter Doshi the BMJ Associate Editor. 5 Burning Questions About the New Covid Vaccine 鈥 OffGuardian (off-guardian.org) This second one is an article in Off Guardian 2 December that references the BMJ article. From reading the articles my own understanding is that: The Pfizer trial involved 44,000 participants Pfizer claim that 162 participants of the placebo group were infected with Covid 19 but only 8 in the vaccine trial group. Therefore the efficacy of the vaccine has been calculated by taking 8 from 162 = 154 (the difference between how many participants in the trial group contracted the virus and how many in the placebo group contracted it or looking at it another way the vaccine has prevented 154 participants in the vaccine group contracting the virus) The percentage efficacy is therefore (according to Pfizer) 154 divided by 162 x 100 = 95.06%. The first potential flaw is the efficacy calculation is based on a total of 170 participants (8 in vaccine group and 162 in the placebo group) that were infected out of 44,000 or 0.38% of participants in the whole trial. The second potential issue, as the BMJ article points out the groups of participants does not represent the community at large as the participating groups did not include children, adolescents and immunocompromised people (old people or those with underlying medical conditions). Below is an extract from Peter Doshi鈥檚 article in which je outlines his specific concerns with the trial and Pfizer鈥檚 analysis of the results: In the United States, all eyes are on Pfizer and Moderna. The topline efficacy results from their experimental covid-19 vaccine trials are astounding at first glance. Pfizer says it recorded 170 covid-19 cases (in 44,000 volunteers), with a remarkable split: 162 in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group. Meanwhile Moderna says 95 of 30,000 volunteers in its ongoing trial got covid-19: 90 on placebo versus 5 receiving the vaccine, leading both companies to claim around 95% efficacy. Let鈥檚 put this in perspective. First, a relative risk reduction is being reported, not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%. Second, these results refer to the trials鈥 primary endpoint of covid-19 of essentially any severity, and importantly not the vaccine鈥檚 ability to save lives, nor the ability to prevent infection, nor the efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly). Those still remain unknown. Third, these results reflect a time point relatively soon after vaccination, and we know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months, so cannot compare these efficacy numbers against other vaccines like influenza vaccines (which are judged over a season). Fourth, children, adolescents, and immunocompromised individuals were largely excluded from the trials, so we still lack any data on these important populations. In addition, I looked at the WHO website for details on vaccine trials and this is the entry against the Pfizer trial. Note the estimated end date when the trial was set up 鈥 January 29 2023! Study Type : Interventional (Clinical Trial) Estimated Enrollment : 43998 participants Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Prevention Official Title: A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS Actual Study Start Date : April 29, 2020 Estimated Primary Completion Date : August 1, 2021 Estimated Study Completion Date : January 29, 2023

   0    0
Pogelswood1
Pogelswood1 2 months ago

we need more whistleblowers concerned for public safety to rise up and speak up, the National Hoax Service is a disgrace, aiding and allowing genocide and pre meditated murder, dummies in beds and mock energency scenes and trick syringes for the chosen all shown on tv. lying to decieve the public harold shipman is in jail for the same thing , deliberately taking life by lethal injection, so how can this be acceptable.

   1    0
Tam315
Tam315 2 months ago

Respect to the staff that said no.

   3    0
NappieMcNapface
NappieMcNapface 2 months ago

Great video, thanks, Hugo! We must start flipping the script on them and stop calling it a v-word because it's not - it does not create immunity at all, they say it lessens the severity of symptoms of... the mysteriously absent this year, flu. Let's flood their zone with truthbomms - and call them what they really are - they are experimental gene therapies, because if that truth is realized, no one would volunteer to take it unless they're irretrievably stupid or ignorant of the plan to depopulate the world. Thanks again, well done. :)

   1    0
SourceOfLight3
SourceOfLight3 2 months ago

Easy solution, show the public the safety studies that prove there is nothing to worry about, problem solved surely.
All this was planned as almost instantly, everywhere was bombarded with rolling adverts, screens, arrows and all that.
Am seeing a great deal of deaths in all countries as well as 'permanent damage' and minor reactions.

   2    0
Show more

Up next

FINLAND - WOMAN FORCIBLY DETAINED AND TAKEN FROM HER HOME FOR SUSPICION OF HAVING COVID!
07 Mar 2021
FINLAND - WOMAN FORCIBLY DETAINED AND TAKEN FROM HER HOME FOR SUSPICION OF HAVING COVID!
DivideUsWeFall 7 Views