Brand New Tube
Life_In_The_Labyrinth
Life_In_The_Labyrinth 10 Jan 2021
2,965
watermark logo

Common law - Life_In_The_Labyrinth

9 / 32

A Lesson In Common Law, [ I Am The Living Man ]

315 Views

Mirrored From Est. 1983, ⁣https://youtu.be/5dpqQpjoiS8

Show more
6 Comments sort Sort By


Looselemons
Looselemons 6 months ago

i paid £25 for my common law I.D card last year still not got it so people beware

   0    0
bunkerbill
bunkerbill 6 months ago

Plus, the living man and corporation cannot have contract. This is why if you take out a Mortgage you will never see the Bank Manager sign the Loan Agreement that you just signed.Plus as soon as you sign the Loan Agreement it is paid in full by your fiction off shore account.So you actually pay twice over for the property, also you are not the owner, the deeds will say Tenant. It is all Fraud.

   1    0
TureSankara
TureSankara 6 months ago

⁣George Orwell:
If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a masked human face forever.

Don't fall for the CON JOB-1984 scamdemic.

   2    0
truthseeker1234
truthseeker1234 6 months ago

i no the basics behind this but i just keep going down rabbit holes what i want is someone to just put it into basic english with a solid format for all to see that way people can escape all the fraud taxes but so far no one has done this as far as im concerned .if we can avoid the taxes and all the illegal fines and bills for water and council tax you will then starve the people in power and then the citizens of the world could be free aswell as not be forced into working so hard just to exist

   3    0
Stuart
Stuart 6 months ago

But if you own a house, have a mortgage, claim benefits, go to work and get a wage etc, you are engaving in maratime contracts so are consenting and accepting those statutes. Comon law was on for the Barons rights when dealing with the king. The plebs were not included.

   0    0
MichaelandrewWaters
MichaelandrewWaters 6 months ago

its been my main focus for at least the last 5-6 years

   0    0
MichaelandrewWaters
MichaelandrewWaters 6 months ago

i should also add rebut the paperwork correctly and there will be no appearance necessary .. ?

   0    0
MichaelandrewWaters
MichaelandrewWaters 6 months ago

yes and no ... you've got to know your shit to establish your court before the prosecution can do the old trustee/agent switch- a-roo that takes place had you stand up and answer to the name ... particularly when their is no victim / damaged property or plaintiff ... from what I've seen you'd answer as the PRINCIPAL in the matter then directly attack the prosecution for bringing the HEARSAY before the court without full disclosure... had you not fall in one of the many word semantics traps used for tacit consent the prosecution is the only person at that point as( trustee/agent ) who can provide remedy to the charge at which point you demand the prosecution dismiss/discharge all the charges ... as its a bank / business the JUDGE still gets paid ( he's happy) and your out the door in 5 minutes flat ... they have 3 chances to contract with you and if unsuccessful the judge without anything being said will rise and leave the court room ( had you let him return his return signals that the court has been reset ) upon his departure HE WHO LEAVES THE FIELD OF BATTLE LOOSES BY DDEFAULT then demand again for all charges to be dismissed... not as simple as it sounds as the trickery they use with word semantics is the difficult part that would take years to familiarize yourself with ... simple every days words like YOU have a completely different meaning apply in LAW ..

   0    0
Show more