Brand New Tube
Chancer
Chancer 10 Sep 2021
106
watermark logo

Up next

VACCINATED... Suffering.. Remember to be human, we all make mistakes it's being human.
20 Oct 2021
VACCINATED... Suffering.. Remember to be human, we all make mistakes it's being human.
DUBsential · 205 Views

Atwood's Content Deleted by BNT - Legal Action Imminent?

710 Views

BNT remove Shaun Attwood's content from the platform and release statement advising him legal action is a possibility.

Show more
19 Comments sort Sort By


ALBERT BISHAI
ALBERT BISHAI 1 month ago

lost all respect for Attwood after he knuckled under 2 threats from Pedophiles

   3    0
drbadass
drbadass 19 days ago

he as some dosdgy people on as well (known more in UK)

   0    0
Sheltagar
Sheltagar 1 month ago

⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣https://martin777.mymetashop.com/#
The new encrypted cardano blockchain phone
No more government spying
No more google data mining
No more contact tracing
Kommies hate privacy!

   1    0
lions_of_liberty
lions_of_liberty 1 month ago

⁣Sorry @Sunnieday but that's just a load of BS. If Attwood has committed a crime, then it is the victim who should prosecute. It's got fuck all to do with anyone else.
@Sunnieday are you the victim? Mr Chancer, are you the victim? If not, why do you get to be the arbiter of morality? Why do you get to decide other people cannot watch this guy's channel?
Maybe a bunch of people still want to watch his videos. Why do you get to decide they can't do that?

Please reinstate Mr Attwood's channel. Censorship is never the way forward. Please do not bring this toxic shit over from YouTube.

   0    1
Chancer
Chancer 1 month ago

dude if you truly support free speech then what's the issue with me covering this topic? i have no power in this matter, I am observing and reporting, why have you broken down in tears over it?

   2    0
Bern Lak
Bern Lak 1 month ago

Victims don't prosecute. The State prosecutes.

   0    0
lions_of_liberty
lions_of_liberty 1 month ago

@Chancer: did you hear me saying YOUR channel should be taken down. You didn't right? That's because I'd never say that. I fully support your right to have a platform to whine about Attwood to your hearts content. Who knows, someone might actually want to sit through that. What I don't support is deplatforming Attwood or anyone else - and this is what you appear to be supporting. As for more specific points, see my other comments. Hope that clarifies?

   0    1
Chancer
Chancer 1 month ago

@lions_of_liberty: no it doesn't clarify anything, I simply observe and comment. I have seen your other comments; I don't even know where to begin with your talking-points. You seem to have taken a moral stance on a topic about which you know very little - you even ask "Where do you draw the line in deciding if someone is "vulnerable" and is "being taken advantage of"? How is it you know this?" - Shaun Attwood himself is the one who has said this on many many occasions while he had the gofundme active for her (which took £5000 off his audience) - it was only after the sexual photos and video (which in HIS words recreated her childhood sexual abuse that she had talked about on his show) that he began saying she was not vulnerable and that BNT had made him say that and that people were mis-remembering or lying. You may not think it's worth talking about, in which case, I put it to you again, why do you sound like you're crying as you type?

   1    0
Chancer
Chancer 1 month ago

They're also now trying to say she is not autistic despite this being mentioned several times by Shaun and Cali in the early days on videos published on his channel. Once the photos of her flicking the bean on his bed and calling him daddy while dressed as a toddler came out, suddenly her autism transformed into her being more street smart than anyone else in Britain.

   1    0
BigMU1968
BigMU1968 27 days ago

@Chancer: Wow, I did listen to the discussion between Atwood, Butt and Ann but I was confused and frustrated as I did'nt know what the point of the discussion was.

   0    0
BigMU1968
BigMU1968 27 days ago

@BigMU1968: And now you have highlighted what the discussion was about and it's jaw dropping. If Atwood did what is claimed and it can be substantiated then he is a bad person who abused his authority!!

   1    0
lions_of_liberty
lions_of_liberty 18 days ago

@Chancer: mate, I didn't say Attwood was a good person. You don't seem to be getting it. I am not defending him or anything he has done. I am defending HIS RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. If someone tried to take your channel down I would DEFEND YOUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. Are you following me? Now I don't know if Attwood is a good guy or not. Frankly I don't give a fuck. I fully support you standing up and bitching about the guy. Please do carry on. However, what I absolutely DO NOT support is him having his channel removed, or anybody fighting to do that. Yes, you can tell everybody what a bad person he is. But people have a right to also hear his side of the story, and then they can decide for themselves whether they want to watch him or not. The free market can decide. I could not give a shit about what you claim Attwood has done. If it is illegal, call the police. If not by all means whinge. But under no circumstances are you the god that gets to decide other people cannot choose to listen to him. Not sure why this simple point takes so much repeating?

   0    0
lions_of_liberty
lions_of_liberty 1 month ago

⁣Why does this Chancer guy get to decide if this girl was "vulnerable" or not? Does he mean he thinks she is not capable of consent? That's pretty patronising. So
a person who has been a victim of sexual abuse can never have a sexual relationship again, then? It's always rape after that is it? How come she is taken at her word (and so apparently
is regarded as having capacity) when describing herself as being an abuse victim, but then is regarded as not having capacity when it comes to deciding who to sleep with? Where do
you draw the line in deciding if someone is "vulnerable" and is "being taken advantage of"? How is it you know this? Maybe she is taking advantage of him - a nice rich guy with a
big house? There must have been something in it for her, or she wouldn't have *consented* to doing it. (And if she didn't consent, then there is the crime. But even this Chancer guy
seems to be saying she did consent.) And @Sunnieday when calling her a "sex trafficked brain damaged not ok mentally woman" - this was your diagnosis as a professional psychiatrist after a thorough
hands on investigation was it? Who the hell are you to pin that label on her, and decide as a result that Mr Attwood needs his channel removing.

Fuck off with this bullshit.

   0    2
Chancer
Chancer 1 month ago

you obviously don't know the reasons he had his content removed, it has nothing to do with what he got up to with cali

   2    0
Chancer
Chancer 1 month ago

vulnerable was the phrase used by Attwood himself

   1    0
BigMU1968
BigMU1968 27 days ago

Listen here you nonce lover Atwood was in an important position of responsibility and he abused the trust put in him. If you know that someone is a victim of such serious sexual abuse why would you have them re-live their abuse nightmare? Dressing her up to look like a child , playing with herself whilst that nonce is photographing her for nothing more than self gratification! What did she get out of it?? If the imformation I have read above is true then he doesn't deserve a platform. He is fake news and a fake person masquerading as a helper and concerned friend. Pedos use the same tactics!!

   1    0
lions_of_liberty
lions_of_liberty 27 days ago

@BigMU1968: she was a grown woman, and consented, thus Attwood is not a "nonce". You are the person being dangerous in calling someone something they are not. "Dressing her up to look like a child" - did she consent to this? In which case she dressed herself up. Don't be so patronising as to suggest she can't make decisions. As for "to look like a child" - even if you argue she "looked like a child" (subjective) she wasn't ACTUALLY a child, so there is no crime. If my girlfriend dresses in a bunny rabbit outfit it don't make me guilty of bestiality either. Finally "he doesn't deserve a platform" - so you are to be the judge of this are you? What gives you the right to decide who "deserves" a platform and who doesn't? This kind of toxic authoritarian bullshit is exactly what the truther movement is trying to get away from. Censorship is never good. Even if you think Attwood did something wrong - hell even if he really DID do something wrong, he is still entitled to have a voice. That's what FREE SPEECH means. Do you get it fucker FREE SPEECH. FREE. SPEECH. Similarly I think you are a complete cunt, but when someone tries to take your channel away, I'll still fight your corner. Like I said, i don't even watch Attwood. That's not the point.

   0    1
arch666999
arch666999 1 month ago

scatwood is pure scum..

   3    0
Show more

Up next

VACCINATED... Suffering.. Remember to be human, we all make mistakes it's being human.
20 Oct 2021
VACCINATED... Suffering.. Remember to be human, we all make mistakes it's being human.
DUBsential · 205 Views