Brand New Tube
DUBsential
DUBsential 27 Jul 2021
1,200
watermark logo

Up next

No-Go Zone: Skin-Penetrating Nano-Aerosols With ‘Chimeric Spike Proteins’ & Military Crush Austr
23 Sep 2021
No-Go Zone: Skin-Penetrating Nano-Aerosols With ‘Chimeric Spike Proteins’ & Military Crush Austr
Red Ice TV · 134 Views

Economic Decline & The Risk Of Inflation--America Heading Toward a South African-Style Implosion

29 Views

⁣Economic Decline And The Risk Of Inflation--America Heading Toward a South African-Style Social Implosion

Creating a bunch of money out of thin air isn't a recovery by any stretch of the imagination. If it were, we would never have to recover from anything.
The Federal Reserve's Monetary System is coming to an end.



The monetary system is a major component of the whole economic system. Despite that, today we take it for granted and don’t even ask ourselves how it works and if it is the best solution available or the correct way to manage things.

Even though it appears to be stable, history shows that monetary systems changed periodically in the last century (20–30 years on average).

The main difference between our current monetary system and the previous monetary system is that today it is entirely based on FIAT Currency, in contrast to older monetary systems that were backed by gold.


atlantis report

Show more
4 Comments sort Sort By


2 months ago



The financial editor of "The Daily Herald" of London wrote on Sept. 30, 1933 of "Mr. Norman’s
decision to give the Nazis the backing of the Bank (of England.)" John Hargrave, in his biography
of Montagu Norman says,
"It is quite certain that Norman did all he could to assist Hitlerism to gain and maintain political
power, operating on the financial plane from his stronghold in Threadneedle Street." [i.e. Bank
of England.--Ed.]P 64
⁣The two divergent political
groups in the 1930’s in England were the War Party, led by Winston Churchill, who furiously
demanded that England go to war against Germany, and the Appeasement Party, led by Neville
Chamberlain. After Munich, Hitler believed the Chamberlain group to be the dominant party in
England, and Churchill a minor rabble-rouser. Because of his own financial backers, the
Schroders, were sponsoring the Appeasement Party, Hitler believed there would be no war. He
did not suspect that the backers of the Appeasement Party, now that Chamberlain had served his
purpose in duping Hitler, would cast Chamberlain aside and make Churchill the Prime Minister.
It was not only Chamberlain, but also Hitler, who came away from Munich believing that it
would be "Peace in our time."
The success of the Schroders in duping Hitler into this belief explains several of the most
puzzling questions of World War II. Why did Hitler allow the British Army to decamp from
Dunkirk and return home, when he could have wiped them out? Against the frantic advice of his
generals, who wished to deliver the coup de grace to the English Army, Hitler held back because
he did not wish to alienate his supposed vast following in England. For the same reason, he
refused to invade England during a period when he had military superiority, believing that it
would not be necessary, as the Anglo-German Fellowship group was ready to make peace with
him. The Rudolf Hess flight to England was an attempt to confirm that the Schroder group was
ready to make peace and form a common bond against the Soviets. Rudolf Hess continues to
languish in prison today, many years after the war, because he would, if released, P77
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/P....DF_Books/SecretsOfFe

   0    0
2 months ago

⁣Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, came to Washington on February 6, 1929, to confer with Andrew Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury. On November 11, 1927, the Wall Street Journal described Mr. Norman as “the currency dictator of Europe.” Professor Carroll Quigley notes that Norman, a close confidant of J. P. Morgan, admitted: “I hold the hegemony of the world.” Immediately after this mysterious visit, the Federal Reserve Board reversed its easy-money policy and began raising the discount rate. The balloon which had been inflated constantly for nearly seven years was about to be exploded.
On October 24 [1929], the feathers hit the fan. Writing in “The United States’ Unresolved Monetary and Political Problems”, William Bryan describes what happened:
“When everything was ready, the New York financiers started calling 24 hour broker call loans. This meant that the stockbrokers and the customers had to dump their stock on the market in order to pay the loans. This naturally collapsed the stock market and brought a banking collapse all over the country because the banks not owned by the oligarchy were heavily involved in broker call claims at this time, and bank runs soon exhausted their coin and currency and they had to close. The Federal Reserve System would not come to their aid, although they were instructed under the law to maintain an elastic currency.”
The investing public, including most stock brokers and bankers, took a horrendous blow in the crash, but not the insiders. They were either out of the market or had sold “short” so that they made enormous profits as the Dow Jones plummeted. For those who knew the score, a comment by Paul Warburg had provided the warning to sell. That signal came on March 9, 1929, when the Financial Chronical quoted Warburg as giving this sound advice:
“If orgies of unrestricted speculation are permitted to spread too far the ultimate collapse is certain … to bring about a general depression involving the whole country.”
Sharpies were later able to buy back these stocks at a ninety percent discount from their former highs.
https://21stcenturycicero.word....press.com/2008/02/11

   0    0
2 months ago

⁣The first precept of success in making government loans lies in "creating a
demand", that is, by taking part in the creation of financial panics, depressions,
famines, wars and revolutions. The overwhelming success of the Rothschilds lay in
their willingness to do what had to be done. As Frederic Morton writes in the
Preface to "The Rothschilds":
"For the last one hundred and fifty years, the history of the House of Rothschild
has been to an amazing degree the backstage history of Western Europe. . .
Because of their success in making loans not to individuals but to nations, they
reaped huge profits. . . Someone once said that the wealth of Rothschild consists of
the bankruptcy of nations."
In "The Empire of the City", B.C. Knuth says,
https://www.heritage-history.c....om/site/hclass/secre

   0    0
gongmeister
gongmeister 2 months ago

⁣⁣⁣Simply said: What are we really achieving with all these happy clappy protests that are more like street parties than protests..??

We also need to stop stroking the egos of conspiracy theory celebrities that are just spewing the same rhetoric from last year (they are starting to look more and more like gatekeepers...)

Surely we need to get more serious with this..

Why are we waiting 5 weeks for an 'organised' follow-instructions 'carnival' protest?

Or, do we protest daily independent of SO CALLED 'organisers' and groups, taking direct, peaceful, yet disruptive action?

Or, get on the high streets and parks of our local towns and convert hearts and minds 1-2-1, one by one?

What do you think?

   0    0
Show more

Up next

No-Go Zone: Skin-Penetrating Nano-Aerosols With ‘Chimeric Spike Proteins’ & Military Crush Austr
23 Sep 2021
No-Go Zone: Skin-Penetrating Nano-Aerosols With ‘Chimeric Spike Proteins’ & Military Crush Austr
Red Ice TV · 134 Views