Brand New Tube
WhotheFoxhat
WhotheFoxhat 23 Jan 2021
2,308
watermark logo

Up next

Jam Session with Nigel and John (1996)
08 Mar 2021
Jam Session with Nigel and John (1996)
FrankT1974 · 0 Views

HOW TO LAWFULLY AVOID MASKS, TESTS AND QUARANTINES DURING TRAVEL - PROF. DOLORES CAHILL

1,092 Views

⁣Dolores Cahill joins Monica Smit to explain how the above can be simply accomplished. Reignite Democracy Australia is currently working with lawyers to put together templates that can be personalised and sent to employers in order to protect your natural rights. This includes things like mandatory vaccines, PCR tests and masks.
https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/
Dolores Cahill website
https://dolorescahill.com/
Freedom Airway
https://www.freedomairway.com/
==========
Also SEE: Professor Dolores Cahill on Freedom Airway with James Corbett
https://www.bitchute.com/video/A1SURjWJbvKs/
==========
Thanks to Info that matters for finding this video!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GLPzemAkH3Sq/

Show more
17 Comments sort Sort By


Lordcharles
Lordcharles 1 month ago

Please check on the contract bit Dolores as "Contract Law" stipulates there must be an Offer to Contract a Consideration to Contract and an Agreement to contract.

   0    0
bunkerbill
bunkerbill 1 month ago

Not true,you have no rights unless you denie the Legal Fiction which was assigned to you when your parents grassed you up to the state.
You would have to stand as THE LIVING MAN OR WOMAN for what she is saying to be invoked. But if she is carrying any form of Government Documentation, i.e. Driving Licence then you are standing under the Legal Fiction and have consented.

   0    1
istudios
istudios 1 month ago

You're the one who is saying what's not true. You only have half the knowledge but are pretending you know everything.

   0    0
MichaelandrewWaters
MichaelandrewWaters 1 month ago

cheers ladies... id point out thoe they are only the PARLIAMENT hence everything that you stated is factual.. we the people are the only GOVERNMENT ... they are the parliament and legislative committee & nothing more 🙏❤ tacit consent to a adhesion contract kissing all your unalienable rights goodbye..

   1    0
Angelique
Angelique 1 month ago

ty ty ty. God bless

   1    1
KASC
KASC 1 month ago

Why then is Prof Cahill not willing to be part of a crowd funded legal action in Ireland. She more interested in increasing her online profile than actually taking the stand in the courts here in Ireland.

   0    1
Angelique
Angelique 1 month ago

@KASC: every one has his own reasons to do or not do what they do. She is awake and is informing us. Lets be thankful for all that is givin us and do somwthing about it in or own way. God bless you to

   1    1
istudios
istudios 1 month ago

⁣Perfect information on Common Law or Natural Law. Thank you, Professor Cahill! You are a super heroine! Thank you for all your hard work and wonderful efforts to enlighten and educate us!

Common Law supersedes Statutory Law or Admiralty Law. Any dealings with the police, immigration and govts are contracts, period. In a contract, one side offers or proposes something and the other side accepts or declines, or consents or does not consent. That is how a legally binding contract works.

Without your consent, there is no contract, no agreement that you comply with their orders, no transaction at all. This contract or consent can be made legally binding with as simple an act as you verbally answering 'Yes' to their question 'Do you understand (what I am saying to you)?'. Another way of giving your consent without realising it is to give your personal details to them when they ask for it. Do NOT give your personal details. Simply say 'I do not contract with you. I do not consent. I invoke my unalienable rights under Common Law." And keep repeating these sentences over and over again.

Once you contract with them, you bind yourself to their rules and put yourself under the terms and conditions of THEIR contract. Which means they can handcuff you and jail you if you don't do what they tell you or even for no reason.

The minute one side forces something on you which you do not want or you do not consent to, they are committing a crime under Common Law. When someone violates your unalienable rights, or assaults (manhandles) or harasses you, or detains you against your will, aka kidnapping, you have the right to 'fine' them on the spot. Just name your price, either a lump sum or an hourly rate for the number of hours you are being detained, and declare it to them. Get their personal details and say you will send them the fine. If they refuse to give their personal details but they are in uniform, ask for their name, staff number, title, position, station, division, department, county, state, etc. You can also send them a personal summons to bring them before a Common Law Court jury to answer their violations of your unalienable rights. More info on Common Law Court: https://www.commonlawcourt.com/

   0    1
KASC
KASC 1 month ago

Why then is Prof Cahill not willing to be part of a crowd funded legal action in Ireland. She more interested in increasing her online profile than actually taking the stand in the courts here in Ireland.

   0    1
istudios
istudios 1 month ago

@KASC: Because Admiralty/ Statutory Law does not help her nor us. The state and the judiciary are not on our side. Their objective is to charge us, arrest us, prosecute us, fine us, jail us, in order to (1) milk as much money out of us as possible, and (2) to suppress and control us, censor and ban our voices and remove our rights and liberties. The legal profession and lawyers will work within the Admiralty Law system, because that's what they trained for, what they know and what they earn their living from. They do not deal with Common/ Natural Law, which is what Professor Cahill is talking about here, because lawyers are not necessary in Common Law. In Common Law, we, as living men and women, can stand up for our own unalienable (cannot be taken away from us) rights which we automatically have from birth. Common Law overrides and supersedes Admiralty/ Statutory Law. If you go through the state courts, you are contracting and consenting to submit yourself to their legal system, Admiralty/ Statutory Law, which is biased, unfair, unlawful and is deliberately stacked against us in order to benefit them. As told by Professor Cahill here, she invoked Common/ Natural Law when she was detained at airports for not wearing a mask, not getting tested, not being quarantined. She told them she would be charging them fees for unlawfully detaining her and wasting her time, which she has every right to do under Common Law. They couldn't do anything, couldn't detain her or arrest her, and had to let her go. That's how she managed to fly to various locations for her meetings and speeches.

   0    1
KASC
KASC 1 month ago

@istudios: try that in a court sometime and see what happens.

   0    0
istudios
istudios 1 month ago

@KASC: It has been tried in court many, many times by many, many people, mostly in the UK, and almost all cases were successful, as long as the plaintiffs/ defendants using Common Law knew what to say and how to handle the proceedings. All this info is out there if you look for it. Obviously, you are basing your opinions on assumptions and hearsay.

   0    0
Show more

Up next

Jam Session with Nigel and John (1996)
08 Mar 2021
Jam Session with Nigel and John (1996)
FrankT1974 · 0 Views