Less than 10% accuracy for PCR tests...

PRC methods offer no value from a diagnostic viewpoint. The process is not designed for detecting viruses. The inventor was not a fucking virologist ffs. That is a CLUE! You have to purify it and then PROVE it causes illness. It hasn't been purified and it most certainly has not been shown to be infectious and transmissible between humans.

As Kurt below states, the virus has not been purified. The RT-PCR test devised by Drosten is bogus.
⁣This is a the paper that describes how Drosten et al devised the RT-PCR test that is being used worldwide to lock everyone up indefinitely. I suggest everyone read it if you want to know how badly we have been conned.
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR
https://www.eurosurveillance.o....rg/content/10.2807/1
Some excerpts.
Under Results
"Before public release of virus sequences from cases of 2019-nCoV, we relied on social media reports announcing detection of a SARS-like virus. We thus assumed that a SARS-related CoV is involved in the outbreak. We downloaded all complete and partial (if > 400 nt) SARS-related virus sequences available in GenBank by 1 January 2020. The list (n = 729 entries) was manually checked and artificial sequences (laboratory-derived, synthetic, etc), as well as sequence duplicates were removed, resulting in a final list of 375 sequences."
Just before Methods
"In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community. We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology."
So they ASSUMED a SARS-like virus had been detected and on this basis derived a 'virus' that they used to create the test. They have never actually seen the 'real' virus nor have they ever had a sample of it in their laboratory. It's a virtual laboratory artefact. It doesn't actually exist in the real world. If you go back to the papers that claim to have isolated it you will find they never did anything of the sort. If you want more info on that watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7ibaXq3iUA

There is NO virus!