Brand New Tube
AlanMass
AlanMass 20 Jan 2021
81
watermark logo

Up next

We GOT to defeat the lodges and their Royal Nazi UN  NATO front
03 Mar 2021
We GOT to defeat the lodges and their Royal Nazi UN NATO front
jakob lauersen · 0 Views

Masks and CO2 poisoning: test with meter

467 Views

This video, allegedly made by a science teacher, shows how massive is the level of Carbon dioxide (CO2) that we breathe back when wearing a face mask.

0~1000 parts/million = safe
~2000/million = problematic
3000/million ~ = toxicity

Even with the mask not completely sealed the meter still reads values above 10000 parts per million.

The video was promptly taken down from YouTube by its AI censorship software (hence the double irony used by the person in the video). A few links are still working today (hence me mirroring it for safe keeping).

For those who still think that apart from increasing CO2 toxicity and contextually reduce O2 intake, face masks do actually play any significant role in reducing the transmission of airborne viruses here are some academic and medical studies that prove the contrary:

https://www.cambridge.org/core..../journals/epidemiolo


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.co....m/doi/epdf/10.1111/j


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002

https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix681

https://academic.oup.com/cid/a....rticle/65/11/1934/40



And no, not even the N95 would do any difference


https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
“We identified 6 clinical studies … In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.” 3


https://jamanetwork.com/journa....ls/jama/fullarticle/
“Among 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons. … Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12381

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.co....m/doi/epdf/10.1111/j
⁣“A total of six RCTs involving 9 171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory‐confirmed influenza, laboratory‐confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory‐confirmed respiratory infection and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta‐analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory‐confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43‐0.78). The 4 use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory‐confirmed influenza.”

Show more
11 Comments sort Sort By


Rita Moore
Rita Moore 1 month ago

I agree with this.

   1    0
Ray Sherwin
Ray Sherwin 1 month ago

Nicely done, Man! ⁣https://brandnewtube.com/watch..../a-invitation-from-c

   0    0
Herc
Herc 1 month ago

I AGREE

   2    0
PedroMartinDeClet
PedroMartinDeClet 1 month ago

⁣Let this be our ' = 'Anthem'


⁣DON'T BELIEVE THE HYPE - Public Enemy
https://youtu.be/LK8sxngSWaU

Public Enemy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Enemy

https://www.publicenemy.com/




Public Enemy - Fight The Power
https://youtu.be/mmo3HFa2vjg



Public Enemy - Can't Truss It
https://youtu.be/am9BqZ6eA5c


Welcome To The Terrordome
https://youtu.be/vfowA1lg2G8

   0    1
Kurefour20
Kurefour20 1 month ago

thank u !

   0    0
Show more

Up next

We GOT to defeat the lodges and their Royal Nazi UN  NATO front
03 Mar 2021
We GOT to defeat the lodges and their Royal Nazi UN NATO front
jakob lauersen · 0 Views