Brand New Tube
BNT HUB
BNT HUB 23 Sep 2020
8,002
watermark logo

Up next

MICROSOFT PATENT EXPLAINS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THEIR VACCINE INTENTIONS AND YOU!!
19 Jun 2021
MICROSOFT PATENT EXPLAINS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THEIR VACCINE INTENTIONS AND YOU!!
GEORGIEBOY2 · 2 Views

VACCINES - WHAT SAY YOU ? BANNED ON FACE BOOK, YOUTUBE, TWITTER!

16,887 Views

⁣ALSO WATCH : ASK THE EXPERTS


https://brandnewtube.com/watch..../ask-the-experts-cov


ALSO WATCH : THE TRAIL OF TRUTH


https://brandnewtube.com/watch..../the-trail-of-truth_



ALSO WATCH : URGENT NEWS ABOUT Covid19


https://brandnewtube.com/watch..../urgent-news-about-t


ALSO WATCH: TOP VIDEOS OF 2020 ON BNT


https://brandnewtube.com/videos/top

Show more
268 Comments sort Sort By


Hogg67
Hogg67 1 month ago

We say no and then get forced to have it!

   0    0
Chindit
Chindit 3 months ago

⁣Why would anyone get on a flight or enter a pub full of vaccinated people who are breathing out genetically modified toxins ? Vaccinated travellers should be isolated from intelligent people !

   2    1
2 months ago

What genetically modified toxins? What are you talking about? Do you mean that vaccinated people spread some other kind of disease?

   0    0
Mark Maloney
Mark Maloney 3 months ago

⁣There is no covid virus. Mr. Mullis’s PCR amplification process does not test for a specific virus. Yes, it amplifies RNA/DNA fragments, but it cannot tell you what the amplified fragments of a random sample belong to. The PCR amplification process was designed to take a known (isolated and pure) RNA/DNA fragment sample of something and multiply it so there is enough of it to use for research. There are hundreds of different kinds of coronaviruses in the world, they range from colds to flu's; the PCR amplification process has no idea what has been amplified. Taking a nasal sample with hundreds of different RNA/DNA contaminates cannot isolate one from another. It cannot specifically differentiate the flu from any other coronavirus or genetic fragment. The elusive convid-19 was never isolated, purified, verified, and visualized according to a scientific method called Koch’s postulate; it is not possible to distinguish it from any other genetic material. The test is not valid in testing for the alleged convid-19 virus on any level. Mr. Mullis [Dec 28, 1944-Aug 7, 2019] won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR amplification process. He died just four months before the alleged covid-19 virus was declared. Had he lived; he would have pulled the plug on using the PCR test to detect a specific virus, thus making it impossible to lockdown the world and destroying global economies and lives.

Hear is Kary Mullis calling Dr. Fauci a fraud: https://brandnewtube.com/watch..../kary-mullis-pcr-tes 2:06 minutes.

Here is a video of Kary Mullis talking about fraud in medical research: https://brandnewtube.com/watch..../kary-mullis-on-viru 5:50 minutes.

Kary Mullis, Inventor of the PCR, Talks About The HIV-AIDS Connection. https://brandnewtube.com/watch..../kary-mullis-invento 53:47 minutes. (Slow to load, but extremely informative.)

Words are the central nervous system of the human collective. Spread the words far and wide. Research and critical thinking are an effective shield against ignorance. Knowledge is the strongest armor we can wear in the journey of life…

   0    1
2 months ago

As I have said repeated times before - the PCR by nature is highly specific. I think you have misunderstood how it works!

   0    0
Mark Maloney
Mark Maloney 2 months ago

@DrInternet: Having an alias doctor picture does not make you a doctor. Frauds have many faces. Maybe you could pretend to be Bugs Bunny?...

   0    2
2 months ago

@Mark Maloney: You say that the PCR tests cannot distinguish between different coronaviruses. How could this be possible? Could you please explain this?

   0    1
philipnorthfield
philipnorthfield 4 months ago

⁣Just research each of the Dr's in this video individually. Checking carefully to see if there is critical analysis of their work and where their
expertise lay, what scientific studies they have published and the reception they have received. In addition check to see if they personally benefit from the position they are advocating through products or services they sell then weight their advice accordingly. It is never a bad thing to listen to any idea contrary to the accepted wisdom, it is however sensible to treat it with scepticism if you personally are not a qualified expert and listen to the weight of scientific evidence. The reason is the scientific principal isn't dogma it is evidence based as that evidence changes so will assumptions based on it

   0    0
5pac35tat10n
5pac35tat10n 5 months ago

ARREST BILL GATES. EVIL PERSONIFIED.

   5    0
Show more

Up next

MICROSOFT PATENT EXPLAINS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THEIR VACCINE INTENTIONS AND YOU!!
19 Jun 2021
MICROSOFT PATENT EXPLAINS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THEIR VACCINE INTENTIONS AND YOU!!
GEORGIEBOY2 · 2 Views