Are you 18 years old or above?
I do not expect to survive this war with the NWO.
they've done al this crap on purpose don't yas know so that the ppl will lose it and flip out and do something violent just to give them an excuse to bring in martial law, this best way to deal with this BS is to NO COMPLY WITH IT!!
bad moon rising .... the fight back will be colossal even as msm ignore the signs... when they take away your dreams,jobs,education,kids futures, what's to live for? ..may as well take on the govt ministers and die fighting rather than exist as a whipped obedient slave....covid does not kill 99.7% of infected and the most vulnerable to infection are elderly,sick and now the fully injected ......
I agree, they're going to open a can of worms they wished never got opened.
no it's what they want, so tey can bring in martial law, order out of chaos remember
The Nuremberg Code (1947) https://media.tghn.org/mediali........brary/2011/04/BM Permissible Medical Experiments The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts: 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. [the vaccines are still experimental never passing clinical trials.} 2. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. 3. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. 4. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment. [animal subjects in Prizer and Moderna tests all died.] 5. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. 6. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. 7. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. 8. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death. 9.The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible. [not possible with the vaccine jabs. The suffering never ends after the jabs are given.] 10.During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. The Nuremberg Code (German : Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created by the USA v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War . In a review written on the 50th anniversary of the Brandt verdict, Katz writes that "a careful reading of the judgment suggests that [the authors] wrote the Code for the practice of human experimentation whenever it is being conducted." ["whenever it is being conducted". There are no limits upon the arrest, jailing, and punishment of those in violation of the stipulations found in the Nuremberg Code.] December 9, 1946: Nuremberg Nazi “Doctors” Trials By MAJOR DAN December 9, 2013 https://www.historyandheadline........s.com/december-9 A point that may be overlooked is the fact that 'government policy' imposed the unethical, unlawful, emperiments uopn human beings.
Browse To Upload